RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

115 Users Online (114 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> General Discussion >> Revit Project Management >> Engineers Stamp

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |

Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 8:58:24 PM | Engineers Stamp

#1

vector23



vector23 Avatar

Joined: Sun, Apr 23, 2006
265 Posts
2 Stars: 16 Votes


this might seem like a silly question to people that have been in the architectural business for a long time-but is there any reason in general thatan engineer cannot simply stamp a drawingthat is correct or even mark it for the drafter to make corrections?is the engineer required to do thethe actual drawing or part of itthemselves? and i'm not talking aboutisolated cases but rather in general..

thanks


This user is offline

 

Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 3:24:15 AM | Engineers Stamp

#2

eldados


site moderator|||
eldados Avatar

Joined: Mon, Mar 14, 2005
777 Posts
4.5 Stars: 8 Votes


It is the job of the architect to check that the engineer's drawings are correct, most of the time they won't draw the actual correct size and rely on their legend for sizes. you (I assume the architect) need to transfer this info into your drawings.

in general, on site they must build from the architects Drawings, I have seen too many times builders setting up from Engineer's Structural plans because "they look clearer" and completly stuff the building...


-----------------------------------

Integrator

Architectural Engineering Construction

KarelCAD

This user is offline

View Website

Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:00:32 AM | Engineers Stamp

#3

jjurewicz


active

Joined: Sat, Feb 9, 2008
2 Posts
No Rating


 I agree, having been a licensed arch the past 18 yrs and grad from an engineering school, eng are an arch specialist, much like a doc refers you to a specialist. But just as doc is your primary care physician, so your arch is your primary pro to keep you out of code trouble. Most of us take 24 hrs of cont ed to stay up on the plethora of codes, eng, like an SE or EE do as well, but to maintain a PE (Pro eng) vs an SE (struct eng) its entirely different worlds with little on life safety, FHA, ANSI, ADA, ADAAG, Federal consumer safetey standards and all the other codes and standards we are directly responsible for. Put in a simpler way, we (arch) make sure you and your occupants are safe, SE make sure it wont fall down and PE make sure the building is ventilated properly or that you won't get electrocuted when working to maintain it.

Attached Files

-----------------------------------
John Jurewicz

This user is offline

View Website

Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:23:24 AM | Engineers Stamp

#4

vector23



vector23 Avatar

Joined: Sun, Apr 23, 2006
265 Posts
2 Stars: 16 Votes


thanks very much JJ- your post helped me to understand more..

i see with the checklist that almost everything on it is a concern with

the old hand/CAD/AutoCAD drafting- but nearly all automatic with the

new BIM.. it's no wonder all those billions of dollars were lost..

although i guess not lost relative to the way the old world worked..

 


This user is offline

 

Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11:42 PM | eldados

#5

missgayley


active
missgayley Avatar

Joined: Mon, Oct 22, 2007
36 Posts
No Rating


Quoting eldados from 2007-09-11 03:24:15

"

It is the job of the architect to check that the engineer's drawings are correct, most of the time they won't draw the actual correct size and rely on their legend for sizes. you (I assume the architect) need to transfer this info into your drawings.

in general, on site they must build from the architects Drawings, I have seen too many times builders setting up from Engineer's Structural plans because "they look clearer" and completly stuff the building...

"

 

If this is your experience, please move to the states ~ I have yet to receive architect's drawings that are drawn to actual sizes, as opposed to nominal.

I'm also finding more often (especially since the switch to revit) that we're the ones finding their discrepancies and requesting corrections. 

This is not to start an architect/engineer war of importance.  I think much boils down to the quality of the drafting staff. Both the engineer & the architect are often too busy to check every component drawn in a building and they rely on the drafter to accurately produce plans with the information given. The drafter needs to speak up when something doesn't "feel right" or when they see a conflict, and the best way to spot conflicts is to draw with accuracy (actual sizes).



Edited on: Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:13:23 PM

This user is offline

 

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

Automated date stamp.

General Discussion >> Wishlist

Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:54:23 PM

6

Printing Stamp on Page

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 9:28:52 AM

1

Plot Stamp

Community >> Newbies

Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:39:57 AM

2

Revit 2015 - Architect/Engineer Wet Stamp

Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks

Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:20:57 AM

1

'Draft' stamp in title block won't show

Revit Systems >> Technical Support

Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:55:20 AM

1

Site Stats

Members:

1988888

Objects:

22877

Forum Posts:

152179

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 0.2441

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights