|
|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
77 Users Online (76 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Forums
|
Forums >> Revit Structure >> Technical Support >> revit structure
|
|
|
Joined: Sun, Apr 23, 2006
265 Posts
 |
why would anyone limit themselves to revit building when rs also has the structural analysis capapility? even if you're not an engineer your model has to end up there. (except maybe with residential and light commercial) but why be limited? i have not yet found anyone that knows of anything rb can do that rs can't.. any thoughts?
|
This user is offline |
|
 | |
|
|
active
Joined: Sun, Apr 25, 2004
1207 Posts
 |
RS does not do the structural analysis, it passes along the RS model information to 3rd party packages via the API.
There are subtle differences between RB and RS. You would need to talk to an Autodesk re-seller for more information. If you are doing architecture though, I would just stick with RB. While the differences may be minor now, in the future that may not be the case with more architecture tools in RB than RS.
Tom
Post edited on 2006-05-08 14:27:01
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
Joined: Sun, Apr 23, 2006
265 Posts
|
yes that's what i meant- the ability to pass along the structure for analysis where rb does not..
as for subtle differences i've only seen different button layouts but no functional difference..
as for there might be some functional differences in the future who knows..
i still wonder why someone would choose the version that says: "no you can't pass your
structure on for analysis even if you wanted to" - if there was a difference in price this
might be a reason but i don't see that there is.. anyone else care to comment?
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Feb 10, 2006
1874 Posts
 |
you might want to ask that questions directly to Autodesk
my rep told me the only difference at this point is during install of RS, that the amount of architecture components installed is minimal compared to RB and you will have to do the rest manually
i aggree with tom, that at some point this will surely change from the stand point of architectural tools in RB vs. tools in RS
that's my 2 cents
-----------------------------------
best regards, coreed,aia bmpArchitects,Inc. "Revit has to be implemented, Not installed." Long Live Revit |
This user is offline |
|
|
|
Joined: Sun, Apr 23, 2006
265 Posts
|
i can't see predicting there will be less tools in rs in the future- based on what?
as for different installed components - we get them from the components library anyway..
the only difference i've seen so far is that one restricts you from exporting a model for
structual anaylisis and the other don't.. keep looking for a real difference and let me know..
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
|
Metalic Structure in Revit Architecture |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:10:10 PM
|
4
|
|
Modyfing columns in Revit Structure |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Thu, Nov 1, 2007 at 12:55:53 PM
|
0
|
|
Revit STRUCTURE |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 2:45:21 PM
|
6
|
|
Hello All! Moving Revit Arch Drawing to Revit Structure Problems |
Community >> Newbies
|
Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:18:59 AM
|
5
|
|
Need HELP!! Geting a Navisworks file inn to Revit Structure |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:02:00 AM
|
4
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 1993517 | Objects: | 22881 | Forum Posts: | 152185 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|
Search