RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

140 Users Online (138 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> Community >> Newbies >> Best Approach to Levels? Construction or finish

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |

Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:27:48 AM | Best Approach to Levels? Construction or finish

#1

yushi


active

Joined: Wed, May 2, 2012
0 Posts
No Rating


I'm new to Revit

I have read some tutorials and I wonder what is the best approach to Levels

To define Levels on construction height ot on Finish Height?

I do most of the plan dimensioning on core of the walls but on Sections if I define levels on construction level then my stairs will

end not on finish level but on construction. That is no ideal.

What do you often use on basement level? put the basement level on concrete or on finish(which is like 2" above it)?

 


This user is offline

 

Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:03:37 AM | Best Approach to Levels? Construction or finish

#2

WWHub


site moderator|||

Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
3.5 Stars: 389 Votes


This is all up to you and your project needs.   You can have levels that are used for plans and hosting elements and levels which are there for reference and hosting other elements. 

 

For instance: Because of doors and finsh items, you probably want your basement to be your finish floor.   Your concrete floor could still be hosted by that level but be 2" below it.... or you could have a non-plan level which is structural and has your concrete floor. 

 

How are you doing this basement floor?  As two seperate floors or all described in one floor definition?   Do walls sit on th concrete?  Again, the walls could still be hosted by the finish but have a 2" offest for their start.

 

Just don't over complicate things.  I personally prefer one level that is set to host my items with offsets for a minor amout of elements.  But if I were structural .... I would like some structural - non plan levels - like joist bearing etc.


This user is offline

 

Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:15:35 AM | WWHub

#3

yushi


active

Joined: Wed, May 2, 2012
0 Posts
No Rating


Quoting WWHub from 2014-09-22 10:03:37

"

This is all up to you and your project needs.   You can have levels that are used for plans and hosting elements and levels which are there for reference and hosting other elements. 

 

For instance: Because of doors and finsh items, you probably want your basement to be your finish floor.   Your concrete floor could still be hosted by that level but be 2" below it.... or you could have a non-plan level which is structural and has your concrete floor. 

 

How are you doing this basement floor?  As two seperate floors or all described in one floor definition?   Do walls sit on th concrete?  Again, the walls could still be hosted by the finish but have a 2" offest for their start.

 

Just don't over complicate things.  I personally prefer one level that is set to host my items with offsets for a minor amout of elements.  But if I were structural .... I would like some structural - non plan levels - like joist bearing etc.

"

Over complicating things is not good in my idea,too but the thing is if I'm in process of designing I may want to change stuff quite often

like maybe the finishing..

so if I define stairs and doors by offset, everytime I change finishing I should manually change the offsets. But again defining a level

for construction and finish makes everything complicated.

I guess for now i'll be trying the offset solution.

thanks


This user is offline

 

Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:21:43 AM | Best Approach to Levels? Construction or finish

#4

WWHub


site moderator|||

Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
3.5 Stars: 389 Votes


You've got it backwards.  Don't offset the doors and finish materials.  Too many!  Offset the floor or define the floor with the finish in the definition.  Easy to change.


This user is offline

 

Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:43:18 AM | Best Approach to Levels? Construction or finish

#5

yushi


active

Joined: Wed, May 2, 2012
0 Posts
No Rating


oh ok.

thanks


This user is offline

 

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

Auditorium: multiple levels/slopes slab on grade approach.

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:20:42 PM

2

Revit Architecture 2012 - Copy/Mirror Changes Component levels

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:01:45 PM

2

Levels in Split Home Plans

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 7:48:39 PM

2

Coarse fill color for 3 walls

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:02:41 AM

0

Finish Floor

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:05:38 PM

6

Site Stats

Members:

1990709

Objects:

22877

Forum Posts:

152180

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 0.5283

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights