Forums
|
Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> DUMMY ROOM TAG
|
|
|
active
Joined: Wed, Aug 15, 2012
9 Posts
No Rating |
WWHub, thanks for the summary. It was quite helpful and made since.
-----------------------------------
joenunez
Revit Architecture 2017 \
20170225_1515(x64)
Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 \ Xeon \ 20 GB RAM |
This user is offline |
|
 | |
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Dec 1, 2005
24 Posts
 |
Existing rooms are no longer "bound", once you demo the walls in an existing plan.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
 |
formfunction
Test what I show you. If you place the room before you demo the wall, it is bounded - it will tag and the view will show as I told you. Is the room still bound correctly - no and so the room size/area will be incorrect for schedules. If you need that to still work, then add a room separation line in existing and turn off the room separation for the wall being demoed. So when you do that, it now screws up your new rooms. Nope! demo the room separation line in NEW phase .... did you know you can demo separation lines? Now - everything works including schedules.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Dec 1, 2005
24 Posts
|
I thought of that before I even asked someone on here to shar their "dummy room tag." Thanks anyway, the overlay workaround is still alot faster....my project has hundreds of rooms and so making little redundant seperator lines doesnt sound fun.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
Only need them if you need areas..... which I doubt you do. The tags still work.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Dec 1, 2005
24 Posts
|
Uh Yeah, existing conditions and room areas are kind of important for schedules, etc on big projects?!
Should probably be something Autodesk fixes. As I mentioned, I got my my answer about room tags issues in demo plans from one of the many forums that are dealing with this same problem.
And of course, I am not the only Architect who is dealing with this via a workaround...so you can argue your points all you want...but I am happy with my solution for now.
WWHub, I don't understand why you can just admit that "workarounds" happen sometime.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
Work around-s do happen sometimes. BUT They are a pain for coordination and changes. Revit is a great product because it solves that coordination issue most of the time.
I HATE CHEATING - JUST GET IT DONE ! I have worked in this profession for almost 50 years and I know what problems that process creates. I believe in trusting your model and I want any user that uses my model at a later date to be able to trust my model. Just changing a dimension (like people did all the time in CAD) can really be a problem. Placing annotation lines over model element lines rather than using the linework tool is a real pain to see and fix. Using filled regions and masking regions instead of using the model and cut profiles is also an issue. (I once found multiple instances of items like this all in the same place - a fix over a fix over a fix.... or so they thought) Using fake tags that look just like real tags may not be the same sort of problem but it still is a terrible coordination issue. Creating those, filling in the correct information is a coordination issue.
BTW - You say "....existing conditions and room areas are kind of important for schedules..." so pay attention to your schedule phase.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Aug 26, 2010
2 Posts
No Rating |
"
formfunction
Test what I show you. If you place the room before you demo the wall, it is bounded - it will tag and the view will show as I told you. Is the room still bound correctly - no and so the room size/area will be incorrect for schedules. If you need that to still work, then add a room separation line in existing and turn off the room separation for the wall being demoed. So when you do that, it now screws up your new rooms. Nope! demo the room separation line in NEW phase .... did you know you can demo separation lines? Now - everything works including schedules.
"
Hi WWHub, i read it several times, but still i cant get rooms tags for the demolished rooms in a new construction phase (the original question from formfunction "...a way to tag those old spaces").
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
First - can you tell me how to demolish a room? I sure can't.
You needed to read all of my posts. I wrote:"Architecturally, we think of demo as a phase but in Revit, it is a process done in another phase. That phase is your choice. Typically, we like to demo in the new phase but in this instance, setting the demo of the walls to existing allows the room tags to show."
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Sat, Jul 3, 2010
13 Posts
No Rating |
Hello,
I came across this post today; after a few tests, I think I realized what caused the dispute
It falls into the phase of demolishing the walls: demolish the wall in 1 'existing' phase or 2 'new construction' ?
Most people do demolition in 2 ' new construction' , which cause the problem in question.
If walls are demolished in 1 'existing', then WWHub's proposal will work, no workaround, time saving and net.
But why AutoDesk gave these options of demolishing stuff in 'existing' or 'new construction' phases?
|
This user is offline |
|
| |
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Aug 26, 2010
2 Posts
No Rating |
thanks hifrank for your findings,
If you demolished a wall in the same phase, then the wall is in the "temporary" phase, not in the "demolished" phase (important for phase filters and graphics override)... Also the room boundary doesnt work, so rooms size/areas are incorrect.
Adding a room separator line and then demo for every demolished wall, as suggested by WWHub, is still a workaround, so in this case the original "workaround" suggested by formfunction/Mr. Spot is fastest and better than this.
PS: I didnt try/test this on revit 2017.
Edited on: Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:51:27 AM
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Dec 1, 2005
24 Posts
|
....and.... thank you Manuel7.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Aug 6, 2012
0 Posts
 |
Very entertaining back and forth. Who won?
...Sorry, couldn't help myself. Cheers.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
|
Room tag not showing in only one room. |
General Discussion >> Revit Project Management
|
Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:04:59 AM
|
7
|
|
Dummy Tag |
Community >> Newbies
|
Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:41:27 PM
|
11
|
|
Editing a room tag |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:17:41 PM
|
4
|
|
Using Room Tag Family Parameters in a Celing Tag Family |
Revit Systems >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:52:40 AM
|
3
|
|
Ceiling tag for exposed structure |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Oct 8, 2007 at 11:13:27 AM
|
3
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 1991381 | Objects: | 22879 | Forum Posts: | 152184 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|
Search