|
|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
753 Users Online (34 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 3914 - Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 4:53:14 AM |
Forums
|
Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> Too much for design options?
|
|
|
active
Joined: Sat, Feb 4, 2006
7 Posts No Rating |
I'm the CAD manager for a fairly custom home builder and we have at the time around 20 different homes with three elevations per home. A new manager here is pushing to get away from the customization we've done in the past and go to a whole bunch of specific options (which is fine) but he wants them to all be design options. For basic stuff like different types of fireplaces or adding windows etc. it's easy but when it comes to multiple options involving the roof things get weird. Say I have three different depths of a garage (no problem) but on the other side of the house I have coverd patio and in the master bedroom I have a bay window. In order to have the roof as a part of these options I have to copy (same place) the roof into each option seperately. The problem will come when someone goes to accept a few primary options because then you end up with three different roofs all occupying the same space which doesn't work and leads to deleting all but one and then editing that roof to fit all options basically making the options sort of a waste of time. Sorry for the long post but would you guys do create the options without a roof and edit the roof at the end or just not attempt complicated structural options period? Thanks a ton!
|
This user is offline |
|
 | |
|
|
active

Joined: Fri, Sep 22, 2006
759 Posts
 |
There are others on this forum who may be able to better speak to your question. I don't like the options venue all that well, I would just have multiple plans with the differing major options, then you might be able to use the options venue to do the minor stuff.
|
This user is offline |
|
 |
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
19889 Posts
 |
Don't put your roof (or floor) into the different floor layout options because these items span the entire project. Instead, you could create a Roof Option set that covers say Optset 1/Option 2, Optset 2/Option 3 etc. You would need one roof option for each option set option combination.
|
This user is offline |
|
 |
 |
Similar Threads |
|
Elements that cannot be in Design Options |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:17:04 AM
|
1
|
|
Design options - Working with the design options |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:26:15 PM
|
3
|
|
Design Options & Alternates (2010) |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:36:53 PM
|
11
|
|
COPY/MONITOR ??! |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 8:57:30 PM
|
2
|
|
Creating an Alternate Floor Plan(Revit 2009) |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:18:38 PM
|
13
|
 |
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2182705 | Objects: | 23399 | Forum Posts: | 152371 | Job Listings: | 0 |
|