Forums
Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> Problem using 'paint tool' within copied groups - Revit 2013
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 25, 2013
3 Posts No Rating |
**Repost from: http://www.revitcity.com/forums.php?action=viewthread&thread_id=20823
I'm having some troubles with the 'paint' tool in Revit 2013. Here is my situation:
I have duplipacte instances of the same group of exterior walls stacked up for a tower facade. I used the split face command while editing inside the group to break the walls into their seperate material finish areas. I then used the paint tool to paint the various finishes on the wall areas. Everything is working great so far.
However, when I finish the edit group mode, the custom paint areas do not apply to the other duplicates of the group instance. Additionally, if I go into group edit mode on one of the other duplicate instances and try paint those walls, the paint from the first group will 'jump' to the most recently edited group instance but not remain on the first group.
To sum it up, I can only get the paint tool to affect one copy of multiple duplicate groups at a time.
Has anyone encountered this before? Is this a group issue, or an issue with painting material surfaces? Is there a work-around, besides making everything seperate groups.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
A splitface is an instance application. After you split the face, did you then edit the group to add the plit face. I just did that and it works.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 25, 2013
3 Posts No Rating |
Thanks for the response.
The splitface seems to be permeating throughout the duplicate group instances, however the paint applied to the various faces does not permeate.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
Paint is an instance element and you can't add it to the group. At least you have the split regions.
Perhaps you could have used a better method.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 25, 2013
3 Posts No Rating |
Well that's why I put the question up on here. If there is a better way to do this, please let me know your thoughts.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Nov 12, 2010
1749 Posts
|
Hard to suggest anything without seeing an image of what you are actually trying to accomplish. To me it sounds like if you have the same facade all the way up you should be able to do it as a single wall.
Edited on: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:14:20 PM
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Feb 10, 2006
1874 Posts
|
"
Hard to suggest anything without seeing an image of what you are actually trying to accomplish. To me it sounds like if you have the same facade all the way up you should be able to do it as a single wall.
He's editing a group and using the split face tool on a wall and painting on material. When he finishes editing and saves the group the changes do not appear in the other groups. WWHub say it's because splitface and paint is an instance edit process, like an instance parameter. Leahye 19 wants to know gives and is there a way to do what he wants that acts like a Type parameter (Group)process.
Edited on: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:26:46 PM
-----------------------------------
best regards, coreed,aia bmpArchitects,Inc. "Revit has to be implemented, Not installed." Long Live Revit |
This user is offline |
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
The question is, what kind of wall does he need. It may be that stacked walls or walls with sweeps or even split may accomplish what he wants but we don't know what the wall looks like. If it is an amoebe shaped area then split is the only answer ... but how do we know without asking.
Edited on: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:31:44 PM
|
This user is offline |
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Nov 12, 2010
1749 Posts
|
Thanks corred for helping clarify. I know what he is asking and what WWHub was suggesting. My question was basically what does it look like, why does it need to be grouped?
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Feb 10, 2006
1874 Posts
|
"
Thanks corred for helping clarify. I know what he is asking and what WWHub was suggesting. My question was basically what does it look like, why does it need to be grouped?
"
Hopefully leahye19 will help us out. I would imagine it's just a standard basic straight wall that he has split and painted some material on. Now he want that exact same wall in all gruops to reflect this change.
-----------------------------------
best regards, coreed,aia bmpArchitects,Inc. "Revit has to be implemented, Not installed." Long Live Revit |
This user is offline |
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
''Visibility grafics'' and ''create parts'' problem when mak |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:45:46 AM
|
8
|
Can't Remove Paint from Stair |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:01:37 PM
|
3
|
Groups Don't Work in 8.1 |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:07:58 PM
|
0
|
Beams that are copied are invisible, while beams placed can be seen?? |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 9:53:43 AM
|
5
|
Problem import Autocad file that contains ''proxy entities''. |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:38:19 AM
|
4
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 1990409 | Objects: | 22877 | Forum Posts: | 152180 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|