RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

41 Users Online (40 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> Using Structural Floors instead of Architectural?? Good Idea or Bad Idea??

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |

Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:09:20 AM | Using Structural Floors instead of Architectural?? Good Idea or Bad Idea??

#1

AllenBall


active
AllenBall Avatar

Joined: Sun, Feb 17, 2008
197 Posts
4 Stars: 9 Votes


Hey Guys, I got a Question.....

 

      I am doing a large hospital in Revit Architecture 2010, we will be importing all consultants model into ours (Structural, MEP, etc...). We where wanting to use the clash detection part of revit on this job due to its size... My question is..

      Should we not show floors in our model and just use structurals model to show the floor slabs in section, details, etc...? or should we have a floor of our own in our model that will just overlap the structural model?? What are the advantages and disadvantages to this??

 

-Allen


-----------------------------------

J. Allen Ball

Revit Architecture 2010 Certified Professional

This user is offline

 

Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:24:46 AM | Using Structural Floors instead of Architectural?? Good Idea or Bad Idea??

#2

brettgoodchild


active
brettgoodchild Avatar

Joined: Sat, Feb 4, 2006
425 Posts
4 Stars: 17 Votes


I would probably have floors in both models. 

As I'm sure you know, if you don't have it in your model, you can't do anything to it.

So if you need to cut floor openings and things like that, you would have to wait for the RST file to get them.

You wouldn't be able to place floor hosted content...things like that.

 

With that said, you may want to hide your floors when it comes time for detailing as the RST package will show a filled region for structural decking, (provided they use it) and may have more accurate layering / thickness...save time on your end.

 

In RST, their floor have more information than what you may need in RAC. There are specific properties in there ment for an analysis package to read...aside from the analytical model.

I would probably just copy monitor them so you can track changes in shape, thickness, opening, etc.

 

 

HTH

 


-----------------------------------

"You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today. "
                             ~ Abraham Lincoln

This user is offline

 

Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:08:05 AM | Using Structural Floors instead of Architectural?? Good Idea or Bad Idea??

#3

AllenBall


active
AllenBall Avatar

Joined: Sun, Feb 17, 2008
197 Posts
4 Stars: 9 Votes


Thanks Brett, you pointed out some things that i had not thought of. I agree though. I think having a floor in my model is the way to go.

-----------------------------------

J. Allen Ball

Revit Architecture 2010 Certified Professional

This user is offline

 

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

upgrade from 2010 to 2011, good idea for tight schedule?

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:45:51 PM

1

Architectural Vs. Structural Linking

General Discussion >> Revit Project Management

Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:42:28 PM

10

2009-Topo & Pad...anyone has an idea

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:33:25 PM

2

Manipulate Structural Grid in Architectural model

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11:47 PM

4

Monitoring Non-Copied Structural Elements

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:27:34 AM

3

Site Stats

Members:

1987549

Objects:

22875

Forum Posts:

152177

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 1.2846

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights