Forums
|
Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> Horsepower
|
|
|
active
Joined: Sun, Sep 28, 2008
20 Posts
No Rating |
What would be considered to be the minimum to really run Revit (2008 or newer) smoothly? This includes printing with shadows, rendering etc? I realise that shadow work, rendering can take a long time, but sometimes it feels like a print job (even to pdf) takes forever. (20-30 minutes to print one pdf with shadow work (3 townhouses))
|
This user is offline |
|
 | |
|
|
active
Joined: Sat, Dec 29, 2007
286 Posts
 |
i have a 3000$ workstation pc and still encounter long waiting times with revit ( not 20min but things like 5min) still a long time to be waiting, so i would say ,,, never enough!!  with what is on the market today.
-----------------------------------
"There is no path to peace,
peace is the path."
Mahatma Gandhi.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Tue, Jan 16, 2007
1009 Posts
|
I recommend at least one Xeon Quad-core 2.5 gig+ 1333 mhz fsb for a processor. I have had an inifinitely greater amount of success with these types of processors rather than AMDs and Core 2 Duos. For me ideally a dual quad-core with 64 bit OS and 64 bit Revit are the way to go.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
active
Joined: Fri, Nov 24, 2006
25 Posts
No Rating |
Is Revit a 64 bit software yet, i know Auto CAD Architecture 2009 is as i just had an up date for that but i dont know if Revit is 64bit yet? Can anyone tell me if it is yet? Thanks
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Tue, Jan 16, 2007
1009 Posts
|
Sept 23 Autodesk release a 64 bit native Revit.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Jun 15, 2006
27 Posts
|
I agree with Alabaster, at minimum a quad-core processor (+2.5 ghz) with +3 GB ram. If you want it to run smoother visually, especially with regards to shadows, get at least a 512MB graphics card. My specs are Quad-Core2 (2.5 ghz, 1333 fsb, 6 mb cache), 3GB ram (667 mhz), 256MB graphics card, 32 bit OS. Price was an issue, or I would have definitely went with a Xeon Quad, 4 GB ram and a 1GB graphics card. However, the total cost of my system with additional warranties, support, etc. was around $1300...(Dell deal). That thing can crank out a final, high quality, 600 dpi, 50 mb rendering in 20 minutes!
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, Feb 26, 2004
3 Posts
No Rating |
Go 64 bit, Its faster memory is real cheap, easy to get to 6gb -8gb for a minimal investment, quad core for sure im on a 2.0 xeon quad and it does fine, i have a 3.0ghz quad extreme at home which does better but i only have 2gb of ram at home, so between both machines they equal out just about. Ive been on beta for x64 revit, i ran a Phil Reed Journal File from AU my Revit DVD x64 install (not written in x64 code) did the journal in 368seconds. My x64 Revit beta did the same file in 320seconds. The people in the x64 Beta forums however were getting down to 195seconds, but they were using power macs etc....
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
|
Revit Mep connector |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:23:57 AM
|
0
|
|
New computer and Video Card |
Workflow & Implementation >> Hardware
|
Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:16:05 AM
|
1
|
|
Revit & Graphics cards |
Community >> The Studio
|
Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 9:58:17 AM
|
1
|
|
Intermediate Revit user here looking for advice on 3ds max |
Community >> Newbies
|
Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57:37 AM
|
0
|
|
Computer Specs for Running Revit |
Revit Systems >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:06:55 AM
|
0
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 1987187 | Objects: | 22874 | Forum Posts: | 152186 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|
Search